All instructors about studies was certified Enneagram instructors throughout the Narrative Lifestyle. The fresh Enneagram Interval training Courses made use of five pri form of boards, (2) didactic studying, (3) meditation practise, and you will (4) experiential exploration. Enneagram Extreme Courses teachers adopted an overview called New Enneagram Intense®: Partnering Emotional Lifestyle and Soul.

The 3 Basic training courses incorporated pri discovering methods. Brand new Berkeley path integrated everyday Enneagram type panels and you can didactic training. New Minnesota course utilized all four of one’s no. 1 discovering strategies. The brand new Palo Alto course used Enneagram method of boards, didactic learning, and you can experiential mining including led visualization.

Data Analysis

Questionnaires have been typed of the a research assistant and you will delivered to good Cook-Greuter-authoritative SCT scorer (Hy and you may Loevinger 1996) through blog post post. Code quantity were utilized therefore, the rater is actually blind so you’re able to the kind of shot, the fresh new times of the attempt, in addition to knowledge classification type of. New scorer accompanied the education by Susan Cook-Greuter, making use of the fresh Loevinger manual, apart from stems outside the manual (Cook-Greuter 1999). Scored solutions had been repaid on the researchers within the a shine pass on piece which was next used for research studies. To be sure precision of one’s scoring to own contributes to hence professionals went right up or down a couple of stages, a sample ones degree was also scored from the Plan-Greuter herself.

Show

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed that there were no pre-existing ego development differences at baseline among the participants between the sites, F(8, 9) = 0.38, p = .93. The pretest and posttest ego development scores were significantly correlated (r = .48, p < .001), whereby participants with higher pre-training scores also had higher post-training scores.

Because there are a great deal more avove the age of young grownups inside shot, an analysis is actually presented to check on the relationship ranging from generation and you will studies effect. Altogether, forty players (33%, letter = ) enhanced one or more grade following knowledge. Proportionally, so much more 50–59 seasons olds (45%, n = ) compared to the almost every other age range enhanced one or more level shortly https://datingranking.net/edarling-review/ after the education (20%, n = 1/5, below 29; 0%, n = 0/3, 30–39 year olds; 25%, n = 7/twenty eight, 40–44 season olds; and you can 24%, letter = 8/33, 60+ year olds). To examine whether that it pattern are statistically extreme, a good ? 2 take to out-of independence is determined because of the evaluating age classification and you can whether or not a participant experienced pride stage development of one to or even more stages following the intervention (or otherwise not).

A diagnosis was also presented to test the partnership between participant sex and you may knowledge impression. In the event proportionally, even more ladies (36%, letter = ) than just people (18%, letter = 4/22) advanced one or more amounts after the knowledge, good ? dos shot of independence shown no relationships anywhere between gender and you may pride creativity.

Two repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to test for within-subject ego development changes across the training sites. The first model examined the interaction term of ego development by training site type as a dichotomous variable (intensive site vs. introductory site); the model was not significant at the p < .05 level, F(1,120) = 1.32, p = .25. The second model examined the interaction term of ego development by individual training site; the model was also not significant at the p < .05 level, F(7, 114) = 1.40, p = .21.

Paired sample t tests were conducted to examine whether there were significant changes in ego development scores before compared to after the Enneagram training interventions at each site. Data revealed that the Asheville 2005 participant group showed a significant increase in ego development scores following the intervention, t(22) = ? 3.36, p < .01. Table 4 sument scores and the paired t test results.